327 build/cam recommendations - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans Advertise
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2015, 02:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 35
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
327 build/cam recommendations

Hi Guys,


First, I'd like to thank all of the knowledgeable people that have contributed over the years. It's been interesting reading past posts.


So, I'd greatly appreciate some recommendations specific to what I'm going to be doing in the near future.


I recently purchased a rebuilt 327 that a guy had sitting for a couple of years. So, I'm going to disassemble it, make sure everything is clean, have the balance checked, and either determine what cam is in it, and/or what cam I should put in it.


DETAILS:
The car it will be going in is a '67 Malibu.
Trans is a TH350 with your standard B&M shift kit, but have a 4L60E that I will be installing at a later date (the tranny is one of those projects that "has babies", as my old man would say...).
Rearend is stock 10-bolt, turns 3K at ~80MPH (indicated) with 235 60R15 tires, so maybe someone can estimate the gears...


The 327 currently has 492 angle-plug heads with 2.02/1.60 valves.
From what I can tell by looking in the spark plug holes, it seems to have flat-top pistons, so I'm assuming compression will be about 10ish:1...(?)


It has a Performer intake, but I'd be open to buying an RPM...


OBJECTIVE:
I'm going for a "nostalgia" look and feel.
I'd like to have a motor that doesn't suck too much gas on the street, but will turn 14-seconds in the 1/4.
It would be nice if it sounded cool (like an L79), but "works" with a stock converter, and would be great with 2000 stall.
Also don't want to destroy the trans and/or stock 10-bolt one-legger rearend...


QUESTIONS:
1. Cam recommendations to meet the stated objectives
2. Would the 2.02 heads be overkill for my objectives (and make it a gas hog)?
3. Would 1.94 heads be better for my objectives? I happen to have a pair of '68 291 camel humps with 1.94s.
4. The 492s are used/rebuilt, whereas the 291s appear to be "virgin, never used" (believe it or not)... would it be best to use the 492s, and sell the 291s to someone doing a nice restoration, or just use whichever best meets my objectives?


Thanks in advance for the transfer of knowledge!

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2015, 04:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,897
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 37
Thanked 459 Times in 429 Posts
1. Speed Pro CS179R camshaft
(duplicate of the discontinued GM-3863151 cam used in the Chevrolet L79 engine option)
Speed Pro HT-817 hydraulic lifters
Speed Pro VS139R valve springs (Chevrolet Z-28 )
2. Keep the 462 heads with a good valve job, 10.3:1 compression ratio, 64 cc
3. and 4 Sell the 291 heads to someone restoring a 1962 Chevrolet 327/300.
5. Use Speed Pro equipment, buy some Comp Cams decals and save about $150

The GM-3863151 "L-79" camshaft is what my 1962 Chevrolet 327/300 is equipped with. It was installed during a major rebuild in 1990 an the engine is still strong. The GM cam was still available in 1990 so aftermarket duplicates were not needed. That cam works best with 11:1 compression ratio with dome Pistons but it will be good with as little as 10:1 compression ratio with flat top Pistons.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to MouseFink For This Useful Post:
SoulSurfSD (08-06-2015)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2015, 05:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 35
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MouseFink View Post
1. Speed Pro CS179R camshaft
(duplicate of the discontinued GM-3863151 cam used in the Chevrolet L79 engine option)
Speed Pro HT-817 hydraulic lifters
Speed Pro VS139R valve springs (Chevrolet Z-28 )
2. Keep the 462 heads with a good valve job, 10.3:1 compression ratio, 64 cc
3. and 4 Sell the 291 heads to someone restoring a 1962 Chevrolet 327/300.
5. Use Speed Pro equipment, buy some Comp Cams decals and save about $150

The GM-3863151 "L-79" camshaft is what my 1962 Chevrolet 327/300 is equipped with. It was installed during a major rebuild in 1990 an the engine is still strong. The GM cam was still available in 1990 so aftermarket duplicates were not needed. That cam works best with 11:1 compression ratio with dome Pistons but it will be good with as little as 10:1 compression ratio with flat top Pistons.

Thanks for the feedback, MF (are you RatFink's son? )


Just to clarify, the 291s are '68, so good for a 68 resto...
I was wondering if the L79 cam (or Comp Cam's Nostalgia+ L79H) would be too much for a stock converter...?
What trans are you running?


I'll probably go with a 2000 converter in the future, just wondering if I can make do with a stock one on the 4L60, until I feel like shelling out another $400 for a 2000 lockup converter...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2015, 06:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,897
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 37
Thanked 459 Times in 429 Posts
The L79 cam will be fine with a stock automatic or 4-speed manual transmission. A high stall torque converter and low rear end gears are not necessary. The cam only has 64 degrees valve overlap for a noticeable rough idle at 700 rpm.

My '62 Chevrolet Bel Air 327/300 2- door sedan is equipped with the original BW T-10 4-speed manual and a 3.36 rear gear. The engine has the original #3890462 ciylinder heads with Ferrea 1.94" / 1.50" stainless steel valves. The Pioneer/Elgin valve springs were equalized with 110 lb @ 1.700" seat pressure and 280 lb open pressure @ .447" valve lift. Two years ago, I installed a 1967 intake manifold and a rebuilt 1967 Rochester Q-jet rated at 750 CFM after I priced several rebuilt 1962 Chevrolet Carter AFB carburetors that are rated at 650 CFM. I saved $150 and got a better carburetor to boot. The engine pulls hard from 2,000 RPM to 5,000 RPM through each gear.

Last edited by MouseFink; 08-05-2015 at 06:30 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 08-05-2015, 08:12 PM
vinniekq2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: BC,Canada
Age: 61
Posts: 12,246
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 857
Thanked 1,453 Times in 1,343 Posts
sell both sets of heads to someone that wants old heads. You can buy better heads for less money,invest in a small hydraulic roller cam with a mild idle. Make 75 more horse power than using the old heads,still using cast iron and get better mpg.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 01:47 AM
JeffB's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Phoenix,AZ
Age: 73
Posts: 2,248
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 21
Thanked 207 Times in 180 Posts
Since you want a "nostalgia look" cross off the aluminum heads and run the ones you have with an intake like this for the "nostalgia look" Edelbrock Aluminum Intake Manifold C3B for SBC Engines 327 350 Chevy (NOT mine) use the Speed Pro L-79 cam and a Holley R-3310 vacuum secondary Carb or a Carter Competition Series 9635 S to complete the look.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 06:47 AM
Registered User
 

Last journal entry: finally got the engine home
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: madisonville, tn
Posts: 506
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 315
Thanked 77 Times in 63 Posts
I ran this converter in my 89' c1500 for over 15,000 miles before truck got totaled.
it was a major improvement over the stock stall of 1350. worked great, no over heating, locked when suppose to. I do a lot of pullin and up hill climbs around here.
it's advertised a 2075 stall, but was brake stallin 1800-1900, flash stallin to 2500 behind a stock 305 tbi.
shift drop rpm didn't fall out like the 1350 did.
at 1st, I was worried about it not holding up, but it done a hellava job for a $150 converter. it sure make the ole junker truck hit 60 mph a lot faster.
I've bought big brand name converters that didn't work as good as this cheapo stock converter.
you can pick em up at any auto parts store.
i still got the tranny and converter from the totaled truck.
i think it'll work great behind a mild 327 or 350.
http://www.autozone.com/drivetrain/t...0354_190662_0/
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to jax_pap For This Useful Post:
SoulSurfSD (08-06-2015)
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 07:06 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,897
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 37
Thanked 459 Times in 429 Posts
NOSTALGIA: circa 1967:

My associate bought a new 1966 Chevt II with a L79 327/350 engine option and a 4-speed transmission.
The L79 cam was called a "350 cam" back in the day. He could run with a local guy that owned a 1965 Corvette equipped with a 327/365, fuel injection, "30-30" solid lifter cam, 4.56 gears, and a 4-speed transmission. Both were low 14 second cars on street tires and closed exhaust. At the time, I had a 1956 Chevrolet Del Ray 2-door sedan equipped with a "over the counter" 327/365 short block, "30-30" cam, 1957 power pack heads equipped with 1.94"/ 1.50" valves, a 1957 intake manifold with a Carter WCFB carburator, a 3-speed O.D. transmission, 12 lb aluminum flywheel, and 4.11 rear gears. My '56 Chevy could turn consistant 15 seconds flat with open headers and 7.50x14 Atlas Buchron tires.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to MouseFink For This Useful Post:
AutoGear (08-06-2015)
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 07:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 4,769
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 4,126
Thanked 911 Times in 746 Posts
I would go with a roller cam; because I don't like the risk vs reward of the flat tappet stuff.
If you do go hft, make sure you follow proper break in procedures to the letter.

The key to the L79 cam is adequate compression. At least 9.5:1; and lets try to keep the quench distance between .035" and .045"
Doing both of these will keep your 327 from being a gas hog (if you can keep your right foot sane).

If you use an Edelbrock carb; for the vintage look, peel the edelbrock sticker off if its visible under your aircleaner.

Intake should be a Edelbrock C3B, C3BX or C4B or maybe a Holley 300-36 for the vintage "Day 2 look" (the 300-36 would be more 1969 and later if you're theme crazy. There was a dyno test in Hot Rod Deluxe or something that did some dyno testing of vintage manifolds on a pretty stout 283. The C3B/C4B did about as good as a regular Edelbrock Performer, so in a street car you wouldn't be held back.

Distributor would probably be best to use a Pertronix-type drop in module and a matching coil. Option 2 for me would be a Delta 10B box, and use Echlin points in the distributor. Boy will this thing throw an arc :-D

You didn't mention exhaust; Im assuming you're using 2.5" rams horns or basic 1-5/8" headers? Me? Id use the rams horns. Buy em new from Dorman, grind off the brackets and casting lugs. No leaks, no heat and looks the part.

Fun project!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to AutoGear For This Useful Post:
SoulSurfSD (08-06-2015)
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 09:28 AM
jokerZ71's Avatar
Wrench Turner
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Stanton,Tn.
Age: 57
Posts: 4,952
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 613
Thanked 900 Times in 795 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulSurfSD View Post
Thanks for the feedback, MF (are you RatFink's son? )


Just to clarify, the 291s are '68, so good for a 68 resto...
I was wondering if the L79 cam (or Comp Cam's Nostalgia+ L79H) would be too much for a stock converter...?
What trans are you running?


I'll probably go with a 2000 converter in the future, just wondering if I can make do with a stock one on the 4L60, until I feel like shelling out another $400 for a 2000 lockup converter...
FWIW,the Comp Nostalgia L79 cam will perform much better than that repro L79 cam & get better milage.It has the sound of the L79,but,modern timing & lobe profile & offers better power under the curve than the outdated L79 cam.Both cams will,however,need a higher than stock convertor to run well.IIRC,none of the L79 equipped cars were offered with auto trans from GM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 12:39 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 35
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MouseFink View Post
The L79 cam will be fine with a stock automatic or 4-speed manual transmission. A high stall torque converter and low rear end gears are not necessary. The cam only has 64 degrees valve overlap for a noticeable rough idle at 700 rpm.

My '62 Chevrolet Bel Air 327/300 2- door sedan is equipped with the original BW T-10 4-speed manual and a 3.36 rear gear. The engine has the original #3890462 ciylinder heads with Ferrea 1.94" / 1.50" stainless steel valves. The Pioneer/Elgin valve springs were equalized with 110 lb @ 1.700" seat pressure and 280 lb open pressure @ .447" valve lift. Two years ago, I installed a 1967 intake manifold and a rebuilt 1967 Rochester Q-jet rated at 750 CFM after I priced several rebuilt 1962 Chevrolet Carter AFB carburetors that are rated at 650 CFM. I saved $150 and got a better carburetor to boot. The engine pulls hard from 2,000 RPM to 5,000 RPM through each gear.

Yeah, now that I looked at the specs for the cam you mentioned, and Comp Cam's standard repro of the L79, I see that the specs seem to be very close to (as I recall) the Erson cam that I put in my 283 back in '85. I'm pretty sure it was .222 @.050, and I think .454 lift...
I'm sure it would be a bit more fun in the 327.


The specs on the Nostalgia+ L79H are a little different, which is what made me wonder if it would idle OK with a stock converter.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 12:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 35
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinniekq2 View Post
sell both sets of heads to someone that wants old heads. You can buy better heads for less money,invest in a small hydraulic roller cam with a mild idle. Make 75 more horse power than using the old heads,still using cast iron and get better mpg.

Thanks Vinnie... I'll have to decide whether I'm mainly going to be "cruising", with things being more about novelty, or whether I'm really going to be racing (street legal bracket racing). Now that they've re-opened the AAA Dragway (which I can see from my backyard), going with modern heads is something to think about...


I might run the 492s for now (have to find some headers that will work of course), and if I really start racing it, I can always sell them and the 291s, and get some modern heads to get me closer to that 14 second goal...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 12:52 PM
jokerZ71's Avatar
Wrench Turner
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Stanton,Tn.
Age: 57
Posts: 4,952
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 613
Thanked 900 Times in 795 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SoulSurfSD View Post
Yeah, now that I looked at the specs for the cam you mentioned, and Comp Cam's standard repro of the L79, I see that the specs seem to be very close to (as I recall) the Erson cam that I put in my 283 back in '85. I'm pretty sure it was .222 @.050, and I think .454 lift...
I'm sure it would be a bit more fun in the 327.


The specs on the Nostalgia+ L79H are a little different, which is what made me wonder if it would idle OK with a stock converter.
Either of thjose cams,the repro or the Nostalgia will need more than stock stall.A 2500 stall would be about the minimum for best performance.The Nostalgia cam will give you better performance,but,it will still need a higher than stock convertor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 12:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 35
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 5
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jax_pap View Post
I ran this converter in my 89' c1500 for over 15,000 miles before truck got totaled.
it was a major improvement over the stock stall of 1350. worked great, no over heating, locked when suppose to. I do a lot of pullin and up hill climbs around here.
it's advertised a 2075 stall, but was brake stallin 1800-1900, flash stallin to 2500 behind a stock 305 tbi.
shift drop rpm didn't fall out like the 1350 did.
at 1st, I was worried about it not holding up, but it done a hellava job for a $150 converter. it sure make the ole junker truck hit 60 mph a lot faster.
I've bought big brand name converters that didn't work as good as this cheapo stock converter.
you can pick em up at any auto parts store.
i still got the tranny and converter from the totaled truck.
i think it'll work great behind a mild 327 or 350.
http://www.autozone.com/drivetrain/t...0354_190662_0/


Thanks for the heads-up that I can get a "stall" converter on the cheap. Since the 4L60E that I bought is basically stock, it might be better if the converter ended up being the weak point anyway...


I'll have to see if I can find out what the converter that came with it is. Maybe it already has a 2000 stall like this one... the guy that I bought the motor and trans from didn't know anything about them, other than that they were professionally rebuilt...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 08-06-2015, 01:12 PM
jokerZ71's Avatar
Wrench Turner
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Stanton,Tn.
Age: 57
Posts: 4,952
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 613
Thanked 900 Times in 795 Posts
[QUOTE=SoulSurfSD;32676for the heads-up that I can get a "stall" converter on the cheap. Since the 4L60E that I bought is basically stock, it might be better if the converter ended up being the weak point anyway...


I'll have to see if I can find out what the converter that came with it is. Maybe it already has a 2000 stall like this one... the guy that I bought the motor and trans from didn't know anything about them, other than that they were professionally rebuilt...[/QUOTE]

The stall rating of the convertor has nothing to do with strength or weakness.The higher stall allows the engine to operate within it's rated RPM range without stalling or over riding.It's a performance issue vs strength.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Tags
327, 492, angle plug, l79, nostalgia

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need break in recommendations 327 Chevy captainbob Engine 5 04-21-2014 02:56 PM
Chevy 327 build recommendations wilson_wwsc Hotrodding Basics 18 06-25-2013 11:12 AM
327 Help & Recommendations SoCa06Z Engine 48 06-21-2012 03:47 PM
rear end gear recommendations for 327? chevyrally68 Transmission - Rearend 6 09-28-2011 09:26 PM
What Cam is best for stock L31 Vortec 350 heads? 327 Build Colder2012 Engine 7 06-13-2011 06:22 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.