|02-07-2011 09:41 AM|
I agree that "tubular" is in error- at least from what I see @ Speedway.
They have a sheet steel welded up front mount for the SBC/90º V6, but the tubular motor mounts are for the side mounts. There's a side mount for the Buick 231 V6 as well. But IIRC, there's no room to use the side mount-type X-member due to steering box interference.
|02-07-2011 09:27 AM|
|02-06-2011 01:07 PM|
That is a very nice truck.
I will be starting a 1917 REO Delivery this summer. I have acquired a 1992 Astro Van for cheap with low mileage. It is the last year of the 700R4/4L60 Trans before GM went to the electronic 4L60E. The engine is a CPI 4.3L with a balance shaft but the CPI injection is shot. It has the older style eyebrow heads which flow quite well. I have an Edelbrock performer manifold 2111 and a 600 Holley. I picked up a large cap even fire V6 HEI distributor with vacuum advance. This should be about 250HP when done which is good for the REO for cruising.
Anyways the GM 4.3L V6 262 Cu. in. is next generation to the Chev 229 cu. in. V6 found in the 80's Cameros. The non-balance shaft engines will take a sbc roller cam set and have a the same bore and stroke as a 350 Chev small block. The balance shaft engine has roller lifters the same as the Vortec sbc. Comp Cams have good cams for either version.
This may be a good setup for you to consider also.
|02-06-2011 12:52 PM|
|bigdog7373||I still think a newer engine would be the best choice. Check out the engine from a supra if you want to make big power. Cams and springs alone will add 200+ hp. Volvo engine are great too, as are bmw's. Think about all the benifits of these engines: more power, reliability, gas mileage. Worth looking in to.|
|02-06-2011 12:34 PM|
Hi guys... again, the brainstorming comments are all appreciated, and I have been down that road with several others.... The easiest solution to the whole problem is to come up with motor and automatic tranny from a Chevy V6 so I don't have to move the steering, which would be difficult if not impossible with this pickup truck. Another guy has the twin, decided to put in a 350/350 and had to move the firewall back 6". There is hardly any cab room in these trucks to begin with, so it is a mystery to me how he sits in his truck. The original motor was a four cylinder. There were supposed to be two motors stored in the abandoned farm house; I only found one, and a second head. The motor I found had been looted... literally. The pan and crank were laying next to the block, with the pistons removed as well as the carburetor. The rear end was history also, so I went with a 1949 Ford (perches match up) and decided on a modern motor. I installed a 1950 steering system since I had that in stock. The solution to the motor is a Chevy V6 with a front mount tubular system. If you care to look at the project, as with all builds we do, it is documented digitally. I have neglected updating the site recently, and installed the "box" today... If you have never used FLICKR, go to the site and find the words "slideshow" on the right hand side of the screen, in gray print, and click on it. Remember, you will be going back in time to a little over a year ago, when I picked up the pieces. The truck was donated.....
Thanks again for the suggestions. It is always fun to hear other ideas... I have even looked for an old Vega motor, and I have found two Chevette 1.6 motors, with automatics as well. Motor mount issues still make the V6 the best option....
Have a good one..
|02-06-2011 11:28 AM|
I wouldn't use a 153. I would use the marine version ( also far more common ) which is a 181/ 140hp stock.. among the increased displacement, the cylinder head is better.. all the same speed and dress parts fit it..
There is also the Mercruiser 3.7L 400 series. there an inline 4cyl, that use a 460 Ford cyl head.. the only 1 I know the spec on is the 488, and that is 170hp/ 4bbl carb. not so much is available but they are strong runners/ have been put in hotrods and Ford Racing sold the blocks in the 80's for retrofits. there a mercruiser design, but Ford provided the tooling
|02-06-2011 08:25 AM|
Yep, GREAT little motor!
|02-06-2011 08:13 AM|
well there ya go. That little 4 cylinder 153 engine looks perfect and could be "dressed" with oil bath air cleaner and stuff to give it a vintage appearance.sweet. best of all its a chebby goin into a chebby.
You could flip the intake upside down and use an updraft carb and such to at least make it look old timey.
|02-06-2011 07:31 AM|
How about an inline six like the truck originally had! (I believe in 28 that truck would have had a six). You should NOT have to move the fire wall, the engine compartment is a mile long.
An old 250 inch inline six from 1962 up will bolt to any "chevy" trans like a TH350 (dirt cheap) and work great.
In looking for a stock 1928 Chevy six engine photo I found that your truck may very well have had a four.
So how about a little four banger, they do propel the cars they came in over the speed limit.
A late model engine of course is the easiest but how about the classic and great little Ford Pinto? They are still popular in everything from dune buggies to airplanes!
The ultimate best choice in my opinion isn't going to be easy to find, but not impossible! I saw a complete running stock motor at one of the last swap meets I went to for $400 (as I remember it was $400), the "Chevy II" four cylinder. It is basically a six with two less cyl and shares many internal and valve train components with a SBC! I have an old friend (He just "friended" me on Facebook after not seeing him in about 20 years) with a Cool little chopped 34 Ford pickup with one of these motors bolted to the stock Ford drivetrain with an adapter. He drove it every day for years.
How about a pair of these little engines in a dragster! GREAT little motor, and like the later six will bolt up to any Chevy V8 trans or bell housing. (from what I remember, do your homework)
There are lots of options for you and your little Chevy truck. Is it a "little" truck or is it a big truck? Did it originally have a four or a six?
|02-06-2011 04:18 AM|
There's nothing wrong with the 3.8 V6. Could you use some universal joints to move the Steering shaft?
Stay away from the 2.8 V6, not good. 2.8, 3.1 & 3.4 are 60* Degree V6 engines. The 3.4 is a good engine. 90* V8 & V6 Trans don't bolt up to the 60* engines.
The 4.3 V6 is basically a 350 V8 minus 2 cylinders.
|02-06-2011 03:43 AM|
Thanks to everyone for clearing all this up... I sent an email to the seller asking for a couple of pictures of the front of the motor, got them, and instantly knew it was not going to work. I am going back wikipedia and read some more about chevy blocks and V6 motors so I can select something with the correct block or ask Speedway again what to use. I grew up with SBC motors and a V8 will not work because of space issues and I am not going to move the firewall back the 6" needed for clearance. I am also not interested in performance right now; those days are gone and I have a couple other vehicles that get that rush done if I need it. I was/am looking for a V6 to get me down the road at the speed limit or a little better; and that is/was my goal for now. Next up is a 2.8 liter in Iowa.... but I need to ask a few questions here too. One thing that would be helpful. Someone posted three chevy engines that are shorter versions of the SBC motor.... one is a 4.3 and I have had several of those in other vehicles. Can anybody list out, for sure, the V6 motors that have the shortened block? Thanks again.....
|02-05-2011 09:07 PM|
|bigdog7373||Let me tell you, you will be much happier if you use a new style engine in the truck. The ols school style may seem cool now but its not. I wish every day that i would have put and ls engine in my car instead of a small block chevy. Increases the value a lot. The cool thing is that you can use any engine you want. Just my suggestion to you. Do with it what you want.|
|02-05-2011 03:28 PM|
The engines (229 Chevy V6 and 231 Buick V6) are entirely different entities, they share virtually nothing parts-wise and castings are totally different. About all they DO share is a 3.8L designation.
The Chevy 229 is 3/4 of a SBC 305, and is a dead end, performance-wise.
The 3.8L Buick was still being made in different permutations until recently- if not still.
The 3.8L Buick can be made into a high performance engine, but it costs money.
|02-05-2011 03:23 PM|
they did put chevy v 6 engine in the year camaro you have . They called it a 3.8 also. It was 229 cubic inch. the buick was 231 cubic inch. The bell housing bolt pattern is different on the buick from the chevy.as well as the exhaust,radiator ,motor mounts, etc ... I could go on for days.
I would also like to add that NEITHER ONE was any kind of performance motor. They ran the car up and down the road thats about all I can say.
You would be much better off starting with a chevysmall block and if you wanted a vintage look find an original motor mfor it.Good luck
|02-05-2011 03:19 PM|
|LATECH||Professor , they are 2 different engines built by 2 different car companies headed up by general motors, the have very few similaritys. they are what they are.I had pontiacs with chevy engines , chevys with oldsmobile engines, buicks with oldsmobile engines. all from the factory that way.Even cadillac put chevy engines in some cads and olds engines also.I could go on for days.|
|This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.|