I am not interested in bottom end, I just want the thing to scream (there is sanity to my madness).[email][email protected][/email] said:I built my own tunnel ram about 1966 or so. May have been the first one ever built?!? Anyway, it had NO bottom end which makes total sense 'cause the velocity signal is totally killed in the shoe-box section. I'm afraid you are stuck with great +3000 potential a the expense of way less than acceptable bottom end performance. Those manifolds are intended solely for top end operation with NO bottom end. So is the double pumper. Only suggestions I can make are 1) consider getting a vacuum secondary carb and/or significantly reduce the plenum volume of the manifold with Devcon Liquid Steel.
Thanks, and yes, I don't care about anything but WOT. The car is not street legal.stepside454 said:If all you care about is top end...sure, the 700 should work. However, I dont think youll ever get that combo to run great across the board.
I understand what you're saying. I know what times the engine ran in my S-10, so I have an idea of what to expect out of this car.stepside454 said:dont really know enough about the entire package, but Id say mid 11s with proper gearing
just hard to say without more info, dont know what heads you have, if that cam is hyd., solid, hyd. roller, roller, duration @ .050, lobe seperation, what tranny, tire diameter et. etc.