My theory
Here's my theory...
--Stephen Andrews's (dodgy's) postings on alternative gay sites. It's strange to our culture, but ultimately, that's his personal lifestyle choice, and he should be able to do whatever he wants. Freedom. But it shows that he has exposure to internet alternative sexuality culture. He has no problem posting a profile on some Bear sites, and some assorted other alternative sexual sites. Plus the production company. He has ties to producers in the industry. The Playboy Playmate. She'll happily participate in Bullrun to promote her career. But on one condition. If she's driving around in a small car with a guy for a week, he better be gay.
--The questionable rust lines. Inducing rust? Old-timey "real" badboy hotrodders love a rusty ride.
--Richard's ties to Bullrun. He's the Bullrun "Impresario". Not only does he have the badboy image, but they know that he knows how to play by the rules of television. Look at how he obeys the producers in this video:
Bullrun Impresario. By the way, he didn't drive that rat rod in the Bullrun rally, he drove a BMW 7-series. The rat rod was for show, to associate the "real" hotrodding market with the "Luxury Lifestyle" porn-fueled world.
--The Honest trademark purchase, and the overuse of the word Honest in Coker blog propaganda. It means something on a semantic level. If anyone here thinks it's done to honor hotrodding tradition, re-think.
--Bullrun ends up at the Playboy Mansion. I wonder if it's tied in to the bigwigs in the porn industry.
--The "quickly establishing myself as the anti-Christ of the hot rod world" line. They think that the idiot uncultured hotrodders will go for that tripe. They're disconnected with the masses, they don't know how people truly feel.
--Why won't Coker confirm or deny his participation? We made it extremely obvious that we know what's going on in our
It Looks Like article. He tries intimidation. Bullying. He tries to disassociate his name with this by using semantic tricks: "I don't even know Richard Rawlings, we've never met". We school him. He tries to admit association, but he won't do it legally. The closest he comes is: "Gas Monkey should not have used our name". He tries personal attacks. He works in a world where your scripted image is EVERYTHING. The shape of your mustache is more important than most other factors. He thinks that he can win by breaking down my image. It's extremely obvious that a sponsor in a video has some sort of financial tie to the video. He won't confirm or deny. Coker is scared. You can feel the fear flowing beneath his words. He knows we've investigated Stephen Andrews, he's seen our
Truth About Dodgy Monkey Media page. He knows we're going to uncover something, and he doesn't want to be in a position where he's claimed responsibility.
--Why won't David Coker show himself? He's not savvy enough, too bumbling. The older brother comes in to take care of the situation instead.
--Coker is the PERFECT sponsor for this. Huge company, plenty of money. Firm ties to SEMA. He's got the tires, his brother's got the wheels. A wheel/tire sponsor combo can be used to accompany ANY vehicle.
--We drop a hint. We say that dodgy needs to get his "head x-rayed". The porn connections start disappearing from the net.
--Why am I willing to put that pic right in the middle of a post, for everyone to see. What am I trying to show to these guys?
--The "Spank My Monkey" pic, posted in large hotrodding forums. Guerilla marketing. Plenty of hype, little money. Same thing with the Anti-Christ video.
Put the pieces together guys, I know you can do this. What does it all mean?