what peaked my interest in this subject was the claim that .50-070 quench was ideal for use with the grooves. this meant i could (i thought) use my heads without having to mill my block to get 040. which is ideal for non grooved engines. i.e. it was a fix: it would make me run better without spending money and use pump gas. i think that in the racing world, rather than try these grooves, people would be more inclined to do the machine work, match parts better, or just use higher octane race gas, change timing, and forget about detonation issues. i'm not saying grooves wouldnt work on a racetrack, because i believe autobreaths accounts of his work on racecars. but i do believe they work better at lower rpms (also illustrated by a-b's race results in a harder launching car), and will work to make less-than-ideal parts or specs for detonation better: as per EMC when he felt like his c.r. was too high for pump gas.
anybody think the same way on this?
(as for EMC using pistons out of the box, i would think the reasoning there is that the engine isnt going to be running long enough to get any carbon deposits just doing a few dyno pulls. and correct me if i'm wrong, but the guy in EMC who used the grooves placed second just a few points behind first. too bad he cant run w/o them and see if he wins or places third, we'd be done here)--hey wait! maybe he did? where's his number? right here:
BES Racing Engines
78 Harrison Brookville Road, Dept. PHR
West Harrison, IN 47060
(812) 637-5933 i called and LM. they are moving their shop. i asked if they dyno'd before and what improvement the grooves made. they may call back ... might not! they also are changing their number after the new year