I'm only spinning it to 6k rpm.
Doesn't matter what the balancer says if timing is right.
For your dragstrip comparison to others though, I doubt your 5.3 friends are limiting themselves to 6k. Do they also have AR5 or T56?
If you shift your AR5 @ 6k, the fallback on paper after the 1/2 shift is 3616rpm.
If you shift your AR5 @ 7.5k, the fallback on paper after the 1/2 shift is 4520rpm (25% more combustion events vs 3616)
If you shift a WR T56 @ 6k, the fallback on paper after the 1/2 shift is 4242rpm (17% more combustion events vs 3616)
If you shift a WR T56 @ 7.5k, the fallback on paper after the 1/2 shift is 5303rpm (47% more combustion events vs 3616)
Rpm drop after the shift also affects the amount of rotating assy inertia that gets dumped and then has to get paid back. If you are letting off the throttle for the shift, a 6k shift dropping to 3616 after the shift represents a 64% discharge of stored inertia energy. With a WR T56, a 6k shift only discharges 50% of the rotating assy's inertia. That's about 14% less inertia discharge during the shift. The less energy you discharge during the shift, the less you have to pay back. Also the less energy you discharge during the shift the less likely to spin the radials, and if you do chirp the radials you will waste less power doing so.
Your 13.99 SLR with the AR5's 3.75 1st gear ratio isn't helping either. Since the engine will accelerate at a much quicker rate with a AR5's 3.75 1st gear vs a WR T56's 2.97 1st gear, the engine's torque output with the AR5 will be less. In the end the added multiplication doesn't get you anything, while the wider gear spreads cost you higher energy discharges that then have to be paid back.
Grant