The way I see it, and please correct me if I am wrong, is that a longer stroke is better for torque while a short stroke/larger bore is better for horsepower and is easier to reach higher RPMs with.
If this is true, why does popular opinion say that to make a 350 better it needs to be stroked but if you are going to run a 400 it should be destroked? While still others say more cubic inches is the main consideration.
I realize that not all people have the same opinion but the above generalities seem to be true.
The reason I ask is that I am preparing to build a strip only small block Chevy that needs to produce a minimum of 450 horsepower at the flywheel. Which of the above options would produce this goal considering both cost and reliability?
Many thanks!
If this is true, why does popular opinion say that to make a 350 better it needs to be stroked but if you are going to run a 400 it should be destroked? While still others say more cubic inches is the main consideration.
I realize that not all people have the same opinion but the above generalities seem to be true.
The reason I ask is that I am preparing to build a strip only small block Chevy that needs to produce a minimum of 450 horsepower at the flywheel. Which of the above options would produce this goal considering both cost and reliability?
Many thanks!