powerrodsmike said:
Is this tool 3006-a?
That is the tool I copied :thumbup:
It is about 4 dollars worth of stuff at the hardware store .
Later, mikey
As you can clearly see, the caption indicates some variation on tool 3006-a, but from the image the control arms are larger stampings which I don't know the history on the later Fords, but it is clearly later than '55 as the '55 FoMoCo LCA was a multi-piece weldment.
Which makes it a little odd that later Ford would switch to a screw operated tool, or maybe it might make since since it would be a lower cost service tool... My manual for '54 ('55 Mercury uses the '54 manual with a supplement to cover the model year changes) shows something like that, but hydraulic... Kinda like something you would use to straighten a bent unibody.
techron said:
hey slipangle, i also gratuated from college as an automitive engineer. but i became a lowely mechanic because i liked to work on cars. if you have babies napping you area youngin, where did you get your info??? beat the snot out of that spindle. that tapered ball joint will come loose. as an engineer you shouldn't have to ask me, but as a mechanic i responded.
OH, and slipangle, is that your relation to your wheels to your tires, the slip-angel of nascars will put them into the wall, or steer them out of danger. see you later.
I did my co-op at Meritor Suspension Systems, which has since been bought and is known as Arvin Meriotor and before that was under the Rockwell umbrella. The group I was in was primarily suspension springs and stabilizer bars, but I got interaction with other groups - mine was oriented towards consumer vehicles, and as it happens the projects I worked on were SUV's - the other groups were primarily commercial vehicle stuff - the bulk of their business at the time was semi truck axles and trailers. The site where I worked - their headquarters - has the world's largest brake dynamometer.
But where I really learned about the structural part of suspension components was at my first real job at American Axle. I worked on the Dodge Ram front beam drive axle. (This was business that was won that had previously been Dana's) If you think about it from a manufacturing perspective it makes sense. On spindles such as the first generation FoMoCo ball joint suspension design, you have tapers that are machined from opposite directions. You're going to be cutting your tapers in seperate fixture loadings, so you need a good reference surface.
I'm not saying it doesn't work well from the service side, and may well have been intended for both purposes, and we used side impact to break tapers in post-test tear-downs too - especially when we're interested in evaluating seal performance.
That aside, I'm 36 now. I forget when I got the Sun Valley I'm working on, but the hardtop I'm using as the body donor I got when I was 17 out of a junkyard in Pontiac, MI, and that's a whole other story. At the time I got that car, my dad had done at least 50 restorations, having started the hobby a couple years before I was born. Back in the day where the hobby could pay for itself!
And now I'm an engineer for hospital beds! (just had my first anniversary at this job) I miss having auto parts stores as close together as McDonalds, but even in Michigan that's not like it used to be with online stores and less and less user serviceable cars.
I had a fun afternoon running around on errands with our 1 year old girl while my wife stayed home as the 2 year old boy napped. Among the stops, I stopped at AutoZone hoping to find something like tool 3006A since they list something online among the tools they loan, I didn't find it but I found a pitman arm remover - which I need anyway and it seemed like it might do the job.
It didn't, the jaws openned up before breaking the taper, and I was left with an indentation in the end of the threaded stud of the ball joint - more on that later.
Whacking the spindle didn't break the taper - which I tried both before and after the pittman arm tool. I did finally break it with the pickle fork going from behind the joint instead of in front of the joint as I had before.
I decided to not go with whacking the spindle when distortion of the flat surface was apparent on the spindle. I know the taper is still likely to be just fine, but this is going to be a show car and as well as I know that a) this level of detail will probably never be scrutinized, b) I probably shouldn't care if it is and c) the powdercoating I plan on using isn't "correct" original anyway, and as such I'd lose points... Well, ultimately my goal is - for this car - a car that is as cleanly restored as possible, but with any improved technology available that can be done while maintaining the original function... Um... I feel like I can't define what I'm after in 500 words or less.
So now I'm just going to have to deal with the problems of the distorted threads that means the ball joint stud turns with the nut, and I can't get the nut off. I think I have enough space to use the 4" grinder with a cutoff wheel if I have to, for that matter I'll probably just end up splitting the nut, I have enough original hardware that I don't really need this one.