I went over to Summit's site and read all the questions and answers about this motor and here is my conclusion...…
13-14" intake manifold vacuum at 900 rpm's.
9.1:1 static compression ratio for use with regular pump gasoline
Hydraulic flat tappet camshaft (motor is said to have a little lope to it, so it's way more cam than I would use with a 9.1:1 static compression ratio.)
High-rise, dual-plane intake manifold similar to Edelbrock 7101 Performer RPM, so that's maxed out for the application.
600 CFM Holley 0-80457SA carb
Engineered for max hp of 357 @5500-5800 rpm's, max torque of 397 ft/lbs @4500-4800
Engine builder recommends 2000-2400 stall torque converter
What this tells me is that with the exception of a good set of equal length, long-tube 1 5/8" headers, the motor is maxed out as far as bolt-ons. You could go bigger on the carburetor, but you probably wouldn't feel it in the seat of your pants. Stay away from those cheezy short-tube block hugger headers, you might just as well run cast iron manifolds. Plan on paying 500 bucks for a good set of headers, another 500 for a good converter and 500-1000 for rear gears and a locker, professionally installed.
I would be thinking of using a 10", 2500 stall converter and minimum 3.73:1 rear gear. If that does not wake it up to your satisfaction, rig up a turbocharger and blow 5-6 psi into the motor with a good water injection system to help prevent detonation. The internals of your motor will not tolerate even a little detonation.
What Bogie was explaining is that you in your 1st post, you were asking for 400 WHP. There are 2 ways to rate horsepower in the automotive industry, flywheel horsepower (FHP) and rear wheel horsepower (RWHP). Since the torque converter, transmission, U-joints, differential gears, axles, wheels and tires will absorb roughly 20% of the power that is available at the flywheel, a car with 400 RWHP might have 500 FHP.
I would not invest any more money into cylinder heads, without completely upgrading the internals of your motor.
.