Hot Rod Forum banner
2,461 - 2,480 of 6,337 Posts
Ok, I retract that statement then :D, so much a picture can hide:pain:

Kelly
It cracks me up Kelly, you have to REALLY want to show flaws to capture them in photos. I know because I take photos of damage to get paid from insurance companies all the time, or used parts I have to turn away to tell the insurance company that I need to buy new OEM that sort of thing. And capturing the flaws is often VERY difficult if not impossible.

Hell, my Rambler looks pretty nice in the photos I post.....but it is NOT believe me. (sorry Marge)

Brian
 
It cracks me up Kelly, you have to REALLY want to show flaws to capture them in photos. I know because I take photos of damage to get paid from insurance companies all the time, or used parts I have to turn away to tell the insurance company that I need to buy new OEM that sort of thing. And capturing the flaws is often VERY difficult if not impossible.

Hell, my Rambler looks pretty nice in the photos I post.....but it is NOT believe me. (sorry Marge)

Brian
LOL. Some of us rejoice in that aspect of pictures Brian. :D:D:D

John
 
Today I showed Dogs in Reno but a couple of days ago this was outside the front door of a place I was staying at in the Red Woods on the Coast of California.
I call it " Why I can't grow apples in my front yard"

BB :thumbup::thumbup:
 

Attachments

No I don't. you should see it up close. the welds are raw goobers and nothing is straight on it. it's a mess. maybe the fins would be a good idea if done better, but this one certainly wasn't.
Actually, I can see where they used a whole roll of wire in the mig to fill the gap at the fenders. Looks rugged and why the narrow Mustang rear bumper ?? Completely out of balance with the rest of the mess.

If that nice '65 Chevelle next to it was mine, I would've moved....:(
 
mixed feelings about this one.....
Same here.

I wish I could see a side view. The transition from behind the glass to the box usually blows it (JMHO of course), although from the pic, it looks not bad.
Can't speak to the details or quality of build but the concept looks GREAT !! Ford should have built that...:cool:
 
mixed feelings about this one.....
Image
I think they did an excellent job, what the heck, there were 600k of those frigging things made, I see nothing wrong with a few of them being experimented on. :evil:

I think the roof looks AWESOME, the back not so much. It appears to not have a tailgate of any kind?

Brian
 

Attachments

No I don't. you should see it up close. the welds are raw goobers and nothing is straight on it. it's a mess. maybe the fins would be a good idea if done better, but this one certainly wasn't.
he was driving it and showing it, I didn't see your rod on the field..
not fer nothing, but there is a handicapped guy (around here)that brings out his rod to shows it's not perfect.. but he did it..
 
Here is the story on the Mustang. I thought at first it was a Galpin Ford Conversion as they did a ton of stuff with the early Mustang in the good old days but no. It was done in FL. recently.
Here is the skinny.

BB :thumbup::thumbup::thumbup:

1965 Ford Mustang - Kangarute - Modified Mustangs & Fords Magazine
Why did he have to put those outsize wheels on it? I don't mind the seats - I'm a BIG fan of comfort - but those 18 inch (which look more like 18 foot!) wheels gotta go - but that's an easy fix.
 
2,461 - 2,480 of 6,337 Posts